Wolf Creek Movie Analysis

Introduction Wolf Creek is a 2005 horror film that dwells on real events that took place in Australia. Liz Hunter, Kristy Earl, and Ben Mitchell are backpackers who go into the wilderness to see a crater dubbed wolf creek. Upon visiting the site, they return to find that the car they used for the voyage will not start. Mick Taylor is a friendly mechanic who comes to their aid.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Wolf Creek: Movie Analysis specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More However, this mechanic proves to be an aggressive and dangerous person. Mick Taylor is a sadist with a personality disorder reserved for extremely aggressive persons. The film is full of cruelty and brutality mostly from the host, Mick Taylor. Moreover, the film focuses on serial killers preying on oblivious travelers. The tendency of serial killers to use extreme forms of aggression on their victims is revealed in numerous journals. Particularly, D affern, Howells, Ogloff (2007, 100) reveal the cause of aggression in such individuals. This paper is a video reflection of the Wolf creek film. Behaviour of Characters Aggression characterized by extreme violence and sadistic tendencies is revealed through the character of Mick Taylor in wolf creek. In this film, the serial killer poses as a friendly mechanic concerned about the predicament facing the stranded voyagers. The character of the serial killer is depicted in a study by Daffern, Howells, Ogloff (2007, 100-104). According to the aforementined authors, most of individuals who perpetrate sadistic and extreme forms of aggression are loners who find solace in violence. Mick Taylor is depicted in the wolf creek as a traumatized loner who uses violence to get back at the society for failing to make it in life. Liz is one of the serial killer’s victims who find herself tied in a shed. In an attempt to free she comes across Taylor sexually abusing and torturing Kristy. Mo reover, Liz discovers Taylor’s possessions mostly stolen from kidnapped travelers. These possessions include cars and cameras among others. After watching a playback in one of the cameras, she discovers that Mick uses the same strategy to prey on unaware and stranded travelers. Furthermore, Liz discovers that there was a footage revealing that Taylor was following them closely as they entered the Wolf creek and played a role in ensuring they were stranded.Advertising Looking for report on art and design? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The violence depicted in this horror film is plotted and committed by a sole individual with characteristics of aggression depicted by Richardson Green, (2003, 10-15). The character of Mick Taylor depicts a social misfit and an outcast who resides in an abandoned countryside. Anderson Bushman (2002, 28-30), reveal that most potential aggressors, such as Mick Taylor, are motivated by loo king at the societal circumstances that forced them to become who they are. Mick Taylor is motivated by sadistic tendencies that reveal either a troubled childhood or failed expectations. From the movie, the serial killer finds solace in sadistic tendencies, such as the inhuman decapitation of Liz and sexual assault of Kristy. Moreover, the serial killer keeps footages of the inhuman activities to get a motivation for use in attacking the next travelers. In the wolf creek incident Mick Taylor’s character inclines him to exercise extreme forms of aggression. According to Daffern, Howells, Ogloff (2007, 105-107) and Rappaport Thomas (2004, 268), there are numerous ways to classify aggressors. Concisely, aggressors are classified based on the mode of aggression, the target of aggression, and the causes of aggression. The aforementioned classes of aggression are important determinants of the aggressor and the target of aggression. The victims in Wolf creek are vulnerable and wi lling to comply with the demands of the serial killer. Moreover, they are oblivious of his motives and see him as a friendly mechanic, who can help them out of their predicament. Daffern, Howells, Ogloff (2007, 105-107) reveal that targets of aggression play a major role in violent situations. Through a psychological analysis, the motivations behind extreme forms of aggression, such as the one depicted by the serial killer are revealed. According to a similar psychological analysis conducted by Richardson Green, (2003, 15), the motivations behind murderous sprees committed by the serial killer in Wolf creek are illuminated.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Wolf Creek: Movie Analysis specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More From the film and several reviews on the same, Mick Taylor is a psychopath and a sadist. It is apparent that the serial killer suffers from self esteem and a personality disorder that leads individu als to commit heinous crimes such as sexual assault and severe decapitation of the victim’s limbs. From the film Mick Taylor espouses hatred for travelers visiting the historic site. Furthermore, the movie reveals that the three backpackers were not the only unfortunate travelers to fall in the hands of the serial killer. The lack of authorities in this region has motivated the serial killer to perpetrate serious crimes with impunity. No one is near to help the victims after they have been captured by the serial killer. Moreover, the personality disorder possessed by the serial killer is exacerbated by lack of medical attention that aids in ameliorating the problem. Psychiatric interventions may have helped in addressing the problems that compelled the serial killer to perform inhuman acts on his victims. The type of aggression revealed in the film is impulsive aggression. This form of aggression is comprehensively articulated by Anderson Bushman, (2002, 28). These authors h ave helped reveal that physical or emotional aggression can lead to extreme forms of violence, such as the one witnessed Wolf creek. Interactions in Mick Taylor’s life experiences led him to become the serial killer who lacks remorse and uses extreme aggression. Episodic or impulsive aggression is revealed by Anderson Bushman, (2002) as the main cause of antisocial behavior. Antisocial behavior is synonymous with physical or mental forms of aggression. The perpetrator of violence in the film possesses severed a psychiatric disorder reserved for individuals who commit homicide or suicide. As abovementioned, Mick Taylor took advantage of the absence of law agents in the location of his premises, where most of the heinous acts were taking place. Distancing oneself from the community is a revelation of the genesis of mental disorders as postulated by Rappaport Thomas (2004). An empirical study by these authors reveals that the gender and age of an individual is important in exp laining the motivations behind extreme forms of aggression. It is apparent that Mick Taylor is a middle aged man whose social expectations have not been achieved. Lack of achievement or shattered expectations can incline an individual to engage in the crimes of the magnitude witnessed in the film.Advertising Looking for report on art and design? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Moreover, Mick Taylor engages in extremely aggressive and violent tendencies because of the tender age of his victims who cannot resist his advances. Ostrov, Woods, Jansen, Casas, Crick (2004, 355) reveal through their study that gender of the aggressor plays an important role when extreme forms of violence or aggression occur. Particularly, the abovementioned study indicates that male offenders tend to use extreme forms of aggression characterized by violent and sadistic behaviour. On the other hand, female offenders tend to use verbal forms of aggression. In the film, Mick Taylor decapitates his victims, and this is a physical form of extreme aggression. Daffern, Howells, Ogloff, (2007, 103) have elaborated on the main causes of the unfortunate happenstance in Wolf creek. These authors use their study to classify aggressive and antisocial tendencies culminating in injury of the perpetrator. Despite relentless attacks from the victims, Mick Taylor is focused on causing grave bodi ly harm to his victims. Although the motivation behind the behaviour of the serial killer is not revealed in this study, studies by various authors have revealed that personality disorders lead an individual to commit severe crimes oblivious of the ramifications. The study by Daffern, Howells, Ogloff (2007, 107) and Rappaport Thomas (2004, 268) reveal the character of the aggressor and victims of aggression in the Wolf creek. The study also reveals how high levels of aggression lead to violence witnessed in the film. The film elucidates a form of aggression christened impulsive aggression. Daffern, Howells, Ogloff (2007, 107) provide a concrete explanation of the nature of this form of aggression. They state that impulsive aggression is prompted by autonomic arousal via provocation. The serial killer must have been provoked by the behaviour exhibited by the travelers. The serial killer exhibits emotions of anger from the numerous interactions with his victims. Similarly, Rappapor t Thomas (2004, 268) help reveal the motivations of the serial killer in the Wolf creek. The perpetrator of the crimes in the film uses exaggerated aggression because of the perceived isolation by the society. The personality of the Mick Taylor in wolf creek can be addressed through the intervention of psychiatrists. According to Rappaport Thomas (2004, 261), psychosocial treatment and therapy for cognitive behaviour can help cure the personality disorders similar to those exhibited by the serial killer in the film. Optimal treatment for extreme aggression can be achieved through the aforementioned interventions. The perpetrator of killings and severe decapitation in Wolf creek has a characteristic that can be termed as negativism in the psychology domain. Criminals with this personality trait are extremely violent because of negativity emanating from perceived neglect by the society. Mick Taylor exercises impunity and precision in his inhuman acts because of the notion that the s ociety was not interested in what was going on in his neighbourhood. Aggressive Behaviour in Group Situations Although the film reveals aggression perpetrated by an individual, the magnitude of this form of aggression surpasses that committed by groups. In the movie, Mick Taylor perpetrates the crimes on his own. According to Ostrava, Woods, Jansen, Casas, Crick (2004, 357), pro-social and aggressive behaviour may also occur in loners who exhibit severe personality disorders. The victims in this film formed a clique that was too frightened by their predicament that they sought help from a stranger with dire motives. Most of the serial killers often carry out their acts on their own and have similar personality disorders. Psychological problems make them loners. From Liz’s discovery, the serial killer had perpetrated similar crimes. Anderson Bushman (2002, 32) reveals that psychopaths like Mick Taylor are aware about their activities and harbor no remorse. Prior to the happe nstance in wolf creek, the serial killer had carried out similar crimes on travelers. Meier Hinsz (2004, 552), replicate a study by Ostrov, Woods, Jansen, Casas, Crick (2004, 357) in which they reveal the role of individuals or groups in the perpetration of heinous crimes. The serial killer was an irresponsible person motivated by lack of vigilance in his locality. Lack of responsibility is indicated by Meier Hinsz (2004, 552) as a major reason for why most of individuals perpetrate extreme forms of aggression. These severe forms of aggression often culminate in the loss of life or grievous bodily harm of the victim or the aggressor. Conclusion In conclusion, Wolf creek depicts the worst form of aggression and violence that can happen to innocent travelers. The film shows extreme, inexplicable, and gross violence perpetrated without a genuine cause. This film focuses on the predicament of three travelers who sought help from an ostensibly good mechanic. Various authors can help t o explain the motives behind the use of excess aggression by the serial killer depicted in the film. The authors of the aforementioned journals have articulated the form of aggression witnessed in this film. By focusing on the victims and the serial killer’s inclination towards aggression and violence, the film elucidates the role of the target of aggression in a crime. The victims in the film made a grave mistake by seeking help from a stranger in a deserted region. References Anderson, CA Bushman, BJ 2002, ‘Human aggression’ Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 27-51. Daffern, M, Howells, K, Ogloff, J 2007, ‘What’s the point? Towards a methodology for assessing the function of psychiatric inpatient aggression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 101–111. Meier, BP, Hinsz, VB 2004 ‘A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: An interindividual–intergroup discontinuity,†™ Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 551–559. Ostrov, JM, Woods, KE, Jansen, EA, Casas, JF, Crick, NR 2004, ‘An observational study of delivered and received aggression,gender, and social-psychological adjustment in preschool:â€Å"This White Crayon Doesn’t Work†¦ †, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 355–371. Rappaport, N Thomas, C 2004, ‘Recent Research Findings on Aggressive and Violent Behaviour in Youth: Implications for Clinical,’ Journal Of Adolescent Health, Vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 260–277. This report on Wolf Creek: Movie Analysis was written and submitted by user Kayson Johnson to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Why Tsarism Fell †World Civilizations Essay

Why Tsarism Fell – World Civilizations Essay Free Online Research Papers Why Tsarism Fell World Civilizations Essay Nicholas didn’t want to be a Tsar in the first place and so he didn’t really care what happened to his country when he was still in power. He left it up to his government officials to run the country. He was basically being used as a puppet by his officials so really, they were running Russia during Nicholas’s entire reign. Nicholas basically had nothing to do with a lot of things that happened while he was in power. Most of the time it was Nicholas’s officials and advisors who did all the bad things to the people of Russia, such as Bloody Sunday. And also Nicholas’s wife had influence on him and his country as well. Bloody Sunday, was probably the event that led to later revolutionary acts in Russia. Bloody Sunday happened on January 09th, 1905 in St. Petersburg. Bloody Sunday was originally supposed to be a peaceful request from the people of Russia to their Tsar so they could have better working conditions but that all turned bad when one of the royal guards opened fire on the people. Little did the workers know, Nicholas wasn’t even where the protesters were heading. Nicholas at the time was back at home with his wife tending to his sick child Alexis who was the only male heir to the Russian thrown. Nicholas’s wife was also a big influence on how the country was run. She was actually at one point during Nicholas’s reign, controlling Russia on her own, but was under the influence of Rasputin, so really, Rasputin was controlling the country because he had control of Nicholas’s wife. The other influence Alexandra, Nicholas’s wife, had on Nicholas and the country was, she was German born so during world war 1, when she was basically in control, the people of Russia didn’t trust in her loyalty to Russia, causing the revolts in Russian streets to escalate to higher levels. Also, another reason that Tsarism failed is that the country was too large to be run by one person who was never bound to be a very good leader to begin with. The country was becoming of overwhelming size and one person could possibly not be able to be responsible for that much land. In conclusion, there really were many reasons that Tsarism failed. One of the biggest parts is Nicholas, so he should be held responsible. He was the one who was supposed to be in power, but he abused the privilege of running a country and, especially a country of that size, so he should indefinitely without a doubt be held responsible for the fall of this age long traditional kind of government. Research Papers on Why Tsarism Fell - World Civilizations EssayThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationAssess the importance of Nationalism 1815-1850 EuropeAppeasement Policy Towards the Outbreak of World War 2Never Been Kicked Out of a Place This NiceQuebec and Canada19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraCapital PunishmentPETSTEL analysis of IndiaWhere Wild and West MeetRelationship between Media Coverage and Social and

Understanding Either … Or and Neither … Nor

Understanding Either †¦ Or and Neither †¦ Nor Understanding â€Å"Either Or† and â€Å"Neither Nor† Understanding â€Å"Either Or† and â€Å"Neither Nor† By Ali Hale If you’re presenting two alternatives, you’ll often use an â€Å"either or† or a â€Å"neither nor† construction. Here’s how those work: You can choose either cereal or toast for your breakfast. My friend’s car is neither green nor brown. Either is used in the affirmative sense, when you’re presenting possibilities that are both true or valid. Neither is used in the negative sense, when you’re presenting things that aren’t true or valid. So far, so straightforward – but you might have some questions about using â€Å"either or† and â€Å"neither nor† correctly. What About â€Å"Neither Or†? You may well have come across sentences like these: I’m neither angry or upset. This isn’t grammatically correct. The sentence should be rewritten as I’m neither angry nor upset. However, using â€Å"neither nor† can sound unduly formal or even a little archaic. If you want to avoid that, consider rewriting the sentence (e.g. â€Å"I’m not angry and I’m not upset.†) Can You Use â€Å"Either Or † and â€Å"Neither Nor† With More That Two Items? You might wonder whether sentences like these are permissible: She will have to choose either Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday. There is neither bread, milk, nor jam. Grammarians differ on this point, but there’s a long history of both â€Å"either or† and â€Å"neither nor† being used for three or more items. If you’re writing for a particularly formal publication, though, you might want to stick to just two items when you’re using â€Å"either or† or â€Å"neither nor†. Some Additional Rules for â€Å"Either Or†Ã‚   and â€Å"Neither Nor† It can be tricky to figure out verb agreement when you’re using these constructions. Here’s what you need to know: Use a Singular Verb if Both Elements Are Singular If the alternatives presented are both singular, then use a singular verb, like this: Either James or Mary has hidden the sweets. Neither the van nor the car is fast enough. Use a Plural Verb if One (or Both) Elements Are Plural If one or both of the alternatives are plural, use a plural verb: Either the boys or the girls have hidden the sweets. Neither the van nor the cars are fast enough. Omit â€Å"Either† But Not â€Å"Neither† It often makes sense to have a sentence without the word â€Å"either†, such as: James or Mary has hidden the sweets. The boys or the girls have hidden the sweets. However, you can’t omit â€Å"neither† from a sentence – the â€Å"nor† can’t stand on its own. Here are some quick rules of thumb to remember about â€Å"either or† and â€Å"neither nor†: The word either should never be paired with The word neither should never be paired with You can only use nor in a sentence if there’s a neither (Some people say that â€Å"not nor† is also a valid construction, but it’s safer to stick with â€Å"neither†). Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Style category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:12 Signs and Symbols You Should KnowTime Words: Era, Epoch, and EonWhen to use "an"

Operation Anaconda Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Operation Anaconda - Essay Example This operation was to eliminate the Al Qaeda group after they were overpowered by the group three months earlier. The mission used modernized method where the US military and friendly Afghanistan in the valley was to assail the terror group. This was not the case, as the enemy was so controlling and organized, while the sociable Afghanistan’s did not cooperate, hence leaving the Americans to fight alone. The soldiers were able to succeed as they called for air reinforcement because their original ground plan to overpower the enemy was not effective.2 The mission was expected to be completed in three days, but it extended for a month. The US army was considered successful because they were able to eliminate eight hundred Al Qaeda men. These men run away from the valley leaving the United States soldiers in control. The success was established using sophisticated material and the soldiers adapting to diverse fighting methods. This is because it was unable to cope with the environment in the mountains and they were not able to combat the heavy machine guns and grenades that were used to neutralize them by the Al-Qaeda. The operation did not have tactical gears that would neutralize the Al-Qaeda group who camouflaged in the mountains. There were many accidents as many soldiers died from bombs dropped by American aircrafts. Others were killed from helicopter crashes, while a few suffered heavy equipment accidents, inadvertent falling from shipboards, and accidental shootings.3 Anaconda operation has been among the most complicated missions in US warfare history. This is because they were unable to eliminate their enemy in the first account, typically because the soldiers underestimated the enemy and thought that it was an uncomplicated mission. Success was realized after requesting for reinforcement from Delta Force and Seal Team

Blogger (or the general idea of blogs).Learning with technology ( look Essay

Blogger (or the general idea of blogs).Learning with technology ( look at attachment) - Essay Example In schools and in the field of education, electronic and digital technologies have also become valuable companion tools for learning. The internet is filled with websites like Wikipedia, Google Scholar, Google Books, and Blogs which serve as compiled sources of information which students can easily access without having to comb through library books, journals, and encyclopaedias. Blogging and the general idea of blogs have become one of the more relevant eLearning tools. This paper shall evaluate blogging, its applications and uses. A critical analysis of this learning tool shall also be carried out. The first part of this paper shall provide an overview of blogging. The second part shall provide a critique of blogging. The third part shall discuss the learning theories which are applicable to blogging. The fourth part shall use a specific blogging application and discuss its links with learning theories. Finally, this paper shall end with summarizing and concluding remarks. Body Ove rview of blogging The second generation of internet and web use has brought on the Web 2.0 phenomenon, a progression from the initial Web 1.0 design. Where the Web 1.0 design only provided for a unilateral flow of information, the Web 2.0 design has presented with the distinct improvement of sharing information to the online community (Anderson, 2008). The convenient possibilities of the internet has allowed the process of sharing, uploading, and writing information; and editing wikis and blogs has presented educators with myriad tools for their trade. Blogs, shortened from web logs, was first suggested by Jorn Barger when he came up with a webpage which included information, personal musings, journal entries, as well as links, and posts which have been arranged by date (Anderson, 2008). Since then, blogs have largely evolved, taking in more elaborate designs, and topics; and it now even includes an area for readers to post their comments. In effect, the commenting and posting proce ss seems to have allowed blogging to take on a more interactive nature, allowing readers to offer their opinion on the blogs. Blogs also allow bloggers to consider reader’s opinions, to possibly respond to these if he so desires (Anderson, 2008). Blogging is also a media which feeds a writer’s immediacy, allowing him or her to post as often as he would like without having to wait for a date of publication as is so often seen in news or magazine articles. Blogs include words which are ‘tagged’ and in so doing the subject of the post is often categorized and archived into a standard theme where it can later be recalled. By clicking the tags or entering these words into search engines, other related links would appear, thereby allowing the reader to read other similar articles by the same or different authors (Anderson, 2008). Linking is an essential part of blogging because it increases the depth of the discussions, allowing readers to understand the blog be tter (Anderson, 2008). Linking has the same nature as referencing as it gives readers the opportunity to verify the contents of the blog and to compare it to outside sources. Through these links, the quality of each blog is often significantly improved. Blogs are a new means of interacting online as it is a forum by which internet users can pool their knowledge and opinions about a certain topic (Johnson and Kaye, 2005). They are also specific avenues for combined news and data, as

Bias in Historical Description Essay Example for Free

Bias in Historical Description Essay The article reviewed was Behan McCullagh’s Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation in which he gave a brief but thorough outlook on the manner to which historical accounts are peppered with biased analysis and his opinion on how historians would be able to diminish, if not fully obliterate, from the nature of recounting past events. Why History is Biased McCullagh started of his piece by constructing four reasons as to why he thought that historical writings are mainly biased. His first reason was that he believed historians misinterpreted evidences without properly asserting the truth about its justification. His second reason was that information may already have been omitted by historians in compiling such past accounts that cater to make their views balanced. The third reason was that he deems general description of any historical information may include certain facts that are possibly false due to the uncertainty of most available sources. Lastly, his fourth reason was in reference to causal explanations, concisely described in the article as events that substantially modify the likelihood of the event, which are usually focused on a few important causes that renders a misleading point of view in the reader’s comprehension of the process of events (McCullagh, 2000). McCullagh voiced out that historians who often make mistakes in incorporating biases in their interpretations are typically motivated rather than accidental. He also noted difference between personal and cultural biases, delineating that the latter is far more difficult to be rectified than the other as it is ingrained, yet maintaining that historians must still try to do away with personal bias. He then goes on to further illustrate the concept of bias in historical accounts (McCullagh, 2000). The concept of Bias in Historical Accounts: McCullagh elucidated on the point that historians choose subjects which are of interests to them, inevitably providing a more partial basis to their interpretation of historical information. Consequently, historians are said to be products of their environment or culture, which will naturally hold general notions about the past. Thus, written accounts by historians are subjected to the availability of information gathered and on the decisions made through constant debates on what gets included and what should be disregarded. Such process is said to most likely offer misleading descriptions of historical accounts that have a particular cause (McCullagh, 2000). However, McCullagh has held that preconceived notions about a historical subject that are not biased could be observed in occurrences that involves transformation within a country’s economy as well as social structures. Biases are only attached when selective causes are highlighted while others of equal importance are disregarded (McCullagh, 2000). The perception of biases in constructing history should be avoided as according to McCullagh it provides a deceptive account of the historical subject which may cause misunderstandings and unnecessary negative consequences in conflict-driven situations. McCullagh presented three reasons as to why there are some who think that there is no way to evade the prospect of bias in historical accounts. First was that the interests of historians are automatically considered in determining the historical importance of a subject, the information extracted and the word preferences to use. The second was that preconceptions of historians and their contemporaries have biased point of views and the third one is the reiterated thought that historians have ingrained cultural beliefs and principles (McCullagh, 2000). Overcoming Personal Bias: McCullagh presented his opinion on how historians could be able to avoid injecting biases in interpreting historical data. He stated that historians should be committed to standards of rational thinking that would bring about a justified description of the past. One way to impose this is through peer reviews so as to motivate historians to follow certain acceptable guidelines in rational inquiry. The role of the historian is an important factor in maintaining social responsibility and creating a fair account of historical events (McCullagh, 2000). He denotes that multiplicity in perspectives is another way to produce rational historical inquiry as it presents different views of witnesses which melds relevant information into one account (McCullagh, 2000). McCullagh also pondered upon the notion that for people to prevail over biases, historians must accept that historiography is limited within itself and that the end of the discipline should also be considered in interpreting the past in a postmodern view (McCullagh, 2000). Reference: McCullagh, C. B. 2000. â€Å"Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation. † History Theory 39(1): 39 – 66.

The Unrecognizable Role in a Family Essay -- Literary Analysis

It is extraordinary to see how much the world has prospered through the ages. History means the period of time after writing was invented. It is seen through many of history’s works such as Romeo and Juliet, the everlasting story of love, and even through the eighteenth century’s SNL in Gulliver’s Travels. These classics define the meaning of history, but one novel that is easily forgotten with many others is The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. In his novel Steinbeck establishes himself as a true futuristic thinker. Steinbeck borrows straight past the abolition of slavery and harks upon the equality of human rights. Essentially, in a time of a failing economy, it is first expected that there is a minimum sense of hospitality with the basic needs (food, water, and shelter), and are seen through the mercenary minor characters in Steinbeck’s novel The Grapes of Wrath. Steinbeck suggests a radical difference in the Joad family to the rest of the world. This dissimilarity in the main characters of the novel is a benchmark of people should be like in the Dust Bowl era. Before the Joad Family began their journey, the individual roles had merely begun to open up, and much of the importance of the characters was not yet realized. Pa Joad is a good, thoughtful man, and he plans the family’s trip to California with great care and consideration. This serves as one his only leadership roles throughout the novel. The stereotypical Man of the family in this era is found in Pa only in the beginning of the novel. â€Å"Who’s there? Tom intimidated by his bulging powerful muscles† (Steinbeck 71). This leadership role is later transferred to Ma Joad slowly throughout the novel with events such as the journey through the desert. The changing of role... ...n nobody travel back east, and the ragged man that the Joads meet at the campground confirms this fear. Even worse than a crowded labor market is the fact that the presumed opportunities because jobs are a fraud; inducing too many workers in order to drive down wages. The ragged men even suggest that the Joads will face a worse fate in California than they did in Oklahoma. Steinbeck really highlights the imperfect world that tags along with the Dust Bowl. It can definitely said that Steinbeck can be seen as a futuristic thinker as well as a hopeful author. By placing the imperfect world in our minds as the environment in the Grapes of Wrath, he allows a little light to flourish from the Joad family that symbolizes the perfect world. Much like Ma Joad’s leadership over Pa Joad the perfect world has overtaken the inhospitality or imperfect world in today’s society.